
|
|
Google OpenSocial - Let's Discuss
belongs to Industry ![]() by Brian Magierski on 2007-10-31 09:56 AM read 6117 times |
Given the lineup of Ning, LinkedIn, Plaxo, Oracle, and Salesforce.com behind this push, this seems important and want to start a dialog internally here on the topic. Depending on what Google does here, this may be more important for businesses than Facebook from a Social Media standpoint.
Here is the background ... let's discuss. I'm shooting to have some thoughts out later tonight.
Let's discuss.
If I'm a social network app developer, I'm certainly going to develop my app for Facebook. If Google creates enough critical mass of users on OpenSocial through Ning and others, then I'll write my app for that network too. As a developer, I'm maintaining two code bases and skill sets - kind of like Mac and Windows.
Ning already is running 130k social network sites with a lot of users. Orkut has a large presence in Brazil and other areas I believe.
Here is an interesting demo from Ning.
Marc A clearly didn't ask his user interface end team before making the statement that ~"all the work is on the back end". IMO, not since the green screen days has this been true. It is certainly not true in these times of (a) ajax, (b) multiple incompatible browsers, and (c) multiple devices with varying form factors.
Brian,
Thanks for starting the thread. Google's announcement has been getting a lot of attention in the last few days, and it's exciting to see the key players signing up for it.
Something very interesting is happening in this space... we've been thru a few cycles and both the industry (providers, pundits, developers) and the community member-civilians have arrived at a place where we can see some breakthrough stuff happeneing very soon. A community is as strong as the collaboration and interaction across its member base, and this (whatever "this" is or will become) will make those interactions happen.
I'm not so worried about critical mass, as I think we already have a large # of people who can be brought in thru existing elements. The issues may be more around whether the utility will be evident and meaningful to sustain interaction as we "open up" the networking tools. If there is "too much" or a sense of "now what do I do?", we may see far less interaction than we expected.
I'm ready for the journey!